Last data update: 2014.03.03

Data Source

R Release (3.2.3)
CranContrib
BioConductor
All

Data Type

Packages
Functions
Images
Data set

Classification

Results 1 - 2 of 2 found.
[1] < 1 > [1]  Sort:

epoc : EPoC (Endogenous Perturbation analysis of Cancer)

Package: epoc
Version: 0.2.5-1
Date: 2013-08-22
Encoding: UTF-8
Title: EPoC (Endogenous Perturbation analysis of Cancer)
Author: Rebecka Jornsten, Tobias Abenius, Sven Nelander
Maintainer: Tobias Abenius <Tobias.Abenius@Chalmers.se>
Depends: R (>= 2.12.0), lassoshooting (>= 0.1.4), Matrix, methods,
graph
Imports: irr, elasticnet, survival, Rgraphviz
Suggests: RCytoscape
Description: Estimates sparse matrices A or G using fast lasso regression from mRNA transcript levels Y and CNA profiles U. Two models are provided, EPoC A where
AY + U + R = 0
and EPoC G where
Y = GU + E,
the matrices R and E are so far treated as noise. For details see the reference and the manual page of `lassoshooting'.
License: LGPL-3
Packaged: 2013-08-26 15:37:51 UTC; btobias
NeedsCompilation: no
Repository: CRAN
Date/Publication: 2013-08-26 17:51:58

● Data Source: CranContrib
● 0 images, 7 functions, 1 datasets
● Reverse Depends: 0

gtop : Game-Theoretically OPtimal (GTOP) Reconciliation Method

Package: gtop
Type: Package
Title: Game-Theoretically OPtimal (GTOP) Reconciliation Method
Version: 0.2.0
Date: 2015-01-23
Author: Jairo Cugliari, Tim van Erven
Maintainer: Jairo Cugliari <Jairo.Cugliari@univ-lyon2.fr>
Description: In hierarchical time series (HTS) forecasting, the hierarchical relation between multiple time series is exploited to make better forecasts. This hierarchical relation implies one or more aggregate consistency constraints that the series are known to satisfy. Many existing approaches, like for example bottom-up or top-down forecasting, therefore attempt to achieve this goal in a way that guarantees that the forecasts will also be aggregate consistent. This package provides with an implementation of the Game-Theoretically OPtimal (GTOP) reconciliation method proposed in van Erven and Cugliari (2015), which is guaranteed to only improve any given set of forecasts. This opens up new possibilities for constructing the forecasts. For example, it is not necessary to assume that bottom-level forecasts are unbiased, and aggregate forecasts may be constructed by regressing both on bottom-level forecasts and on other covariates that may only be available at the aggregate level.
License: GPL-2 | GPL-3
Depends: hts, quadprog, lassoshooting
Packaged: 2015-03-05 06:33:35 UTC; jairo
NeedsCompilation: no
Repository: CRAN
Date/Publication: 2015-03-05 07:40:24

● Data Source: CranContrib
● 0 images, 3 functions, 0 datasets
● Reverse Depends: 0